Today, the Sun Sentinel newspaper published an editorial advocating for cameras in Federal Courts and used as an example that no cameras were allowed in the courtroom for the recent arraignment of former President Trump. We agree and we believe that it highlights the significance of allowing cameras in federal courts and advocates for the same in New York state courts. The absence of visual and audio coverage in courtrooms limits transparency, hindering public understanding and participation in critical legal proceedings.
A Missed Historical Moment: In an unprecedented event, former President Donald Trump faced a 37-count indictment in a Miami federal courtroom. However, due to the long-standing prohibition on cameras and microphones in federal courthouses, the public was deprived of witnessing this monumental historical moment. The absence of visual documentation is a severe limitation in today’s age of instant news and social media, robbing the public of their right to access crucial information.
A Barrier to Transparency: Since 1946, federal criminal proceedings have been shielded from electronic media coverage by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure No. 53. The only exception is limited electronic access for ceremonial events like naturalization proceedings. Consequently, not only were cameras and microphones banned from the courtroom where Trump’s case unfolded, but phones were also prohibited, preventing any documentation by news media.
The Power of Sunlight: Justice Louis Brandeis famously said, “Sunlight is the best disinfectant,” emphasizing the importance of transparency in maintaining a healthy democracy. The case against Trump demands the highest level of public interest and scrutiny, making it essential to grant limited video coverage to ensure openness and accountability. Several prominent news organizations, including the Sun Sentinel, Miami Herald, National Public Radio, and others, petitioned for pre-hearing video access to the courtroom and nearby areas.
A Disappointing Response: Regrettably, the media’s plea for coverage was rejected by U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman, who cited security concerns. Despite the media coalition’s argument about the exceptional public interest and the importance of transparency, the court denied their requests. The absence of audio recordings further hampers transparency and enables potential distortions and theatrics.
The Urgent Need for Change: The importance of public access to legal proceedings extends beyond the Trump case. In Manhattan, where Trump faces charges of paying hush money to two women, the trial is also set to take place without cameras in the courtroom. This antiquated policy in New York state courts is detrimental to democracy and inhibits the public’s ability to understand and engage with the justice system.
Advocating for Cameras in Courts: Allowing unobtrusive stationary cameras in courtrooms would provide the public with a firsthand view of the impartial American justice system. It would shed light on the slow, yet effective functioning of the judiciary, dispelling misconceptions and promoting trust. The current ban on electronic coverage is not only outdated but also undermines public confidence in the government and the judiciary.
Drawing Inspiration from Florida: Florida has been a pioneer in promoting electronic media access to courtrooms. Since 1977, cameras have been allowed in Florida courtrooms, facilitating transparency and public engagement. Even during the historic Bush v. Gore case in 2000, the whole world watched as the Florida Supreme Court heard arguments. The success of Florida’s program demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of allowing cameras in courtrooms.
Preserving Democracy: The absence of visual records in significant legal proceedings involving public figures like former President Trump is a loss for both news and history. Future generations deserve the opportunity to observe and learn from these critical moments, fostering a better understanding of democracy. Allowing cameras in federal and New York state courts would bridge the gap between the public and the justice system, promoting transparency, accountability, and public trust.
The time has come to reevaluate and change the outdated policies that prohibit cameras in court.
Learn About NYCourtCameras.com
Show Support for Cameras in NY Courts by becoming a follower on Facebook.
